Great questions, Mark. Before I answer them, let me first preface my response for anyone reading this that if your question is answered by the "normal" tournament rules, it applies to these new divisions as well. (Just trying to keep things simple.)
Clearly over that past few years there's been some calls for more participation in the tournaments. Clearly, all but a few women have been absent from our tournaments. This program is designed to get them involved. Limiting their options is not the way to do it.
However, if you can explain to the club why allowing women the option to choose to participate in any one or all tournaments is detrimental to the club, I'm all ears.
Personally, I don't see how it could reduce attendance, or hurt the club.
I can understand if you feel it's unfair they have 3 choices and you have 2. Perhaps later down the road, when plenty of women are participating, we can revisit this percieved imbalance.
Before we all start going down the path of "what if's" and "but this might happens", please understand it's not an issue unless it does happen. If that were the case, then we'd have lie detectors, chase boats, and many more additional rules in place just to prevent possible things from happening.
Since these divisions are new, nobody can really predict what, if any, issues will crop up. However, because we're using the current tournament rules in addition to the rules above, we can be confident our bases are covered pretty well.
I think the board, and the club, has made the decision to move forward on this, and adjust as necessary, rather than try to address every conceivable issue before it arises.
To answer your other questions:
Quote:1. Why would you have parnter substitution in a husband/wife--couples format???
Not all "couples" are husband/wife. But that's beside the point. We wanted that provision in the event of a divorce, death or breakup of a relationship. It doesn't make sense to "penalize" a club member due to unfortunate circumstances.
In addition, this allows a family member to stay home in the event a child is sick, family emergency, etc., and not be penalized for it.
Quote:2. Does the "Significant Other" have to be adult?
Good question. I'll punt that to a board member.
Quote:3. Of the opposite gender?
Another good question. The answer is "No, but he/she needs to be your significant other" While we want to keep this as open as possible to everyone, including same-sex relationships, we do not want this to turn into "Team Tournaments".
I would hope nobody would take advantage of the same-sex provisioning as meaning they can pair up simply to fish as a team. Again, as stated above, this is currently a non-issue. However, if male club members start pairing up to fish as a "couple", thereby turning this into a Team Tournament Division, we'll need to address it. (perhaps by creating a Team Tournament Division?)
However, this does leave open to debate who the "significant other" is. My personal interpretation would be a person whom you're involved with in a relationship, or a relative (down south it's sometimes both!) Again, another non-issue that I believe we can deal with fairly if/when the time comes.
Quote:4. A member?
Yes! Again, this is covered under the "normal" tournament rules.
I hope this answers your questions.
Thanks!
Glenn