Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) This needs ALL our attention! (Read 4055 times)
DUNE HOPPER
WBC Member
*
Offline


USMC Ret.  "Full Livewells,
I'll drink to that!"

Posts: 1353
Location: Kennewick, WA
Joined: 08/21/02
This needs ALL our attention!
07/02/07 at 16:19:57
Quote Print Post  
Please follow this link to the announcement about an item that will affect every one of us that is a boatowner.  
If you have a livewell that is equipped with a pumpout, or even if it is only a recirculating model, you will be impacted.  In fact if you have an automatic bilge pump this ridiculous ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeasement will give you a financial bath. Smiley
Please watch this closely and then contact your Congressional Representatives. Smiley  Party affiliation is of no concern in this matter.

http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


Smitty Wink
  

Retired From Everything but Feeshin and doing April's bidding
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Troy
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #1 - 07/02/07 at 22:39:52
Quote Print Post  
water that spashes into your boat? oh my...

troy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Wabasmstr
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #2 - 07/03/07 at 02:11:11
Quote Print Post  
Is the 9th Circuit in California by chance?  If so, maybe we should let them become their own country, detach them from the USA (it's gonna happen one day in the future anyway according to those who study earthquakes) and be done with them.  This is one sure way of killing the boating industry and the fishing industry in one quick sweep.

I'm going to assume the environmentalists are really loving this one.  I personally sent this to everyone I know back east also.  Thanks Smitty for the ALARM......

Chuck P
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Larry S.
Board Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 4201
Location: Kent Wa.
Joined: 08/21/02
Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #3 - 07/03/07 at 03:22:05
Quote Print Post  
Mine are sent!

Angry Angry AngryGRRRRRRRRRR
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
basspro
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #4 - 07/03/07 at 03:46:47
Quote Print Post  
Mine are done.
Russ
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Nick_Barr
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #5 - 07/04/07 at 00:00:28
Quote Print Post  
I already went on and there is a website where you can automatically send a message and a letter to your local representative. I forgot what it is. But, I certainly know that I dont want to have to pay for some $800 Liscence.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Varmint
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #6 - 07/05/07 at 00:49:00
Quote Print Post  
DID EM.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Daryl
Forum Member
**
Offline



Posts: 582
Location: Lacey WA
Joined: 08/21/02
Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #7 - 10/22/07 at 20:41:57
Quote Print Post  
Here is the response letter I received today about the EPA proposal


Dear Mr. Snodgrass ,

 
Thank you for contacting me to express your concern about the inclusion of recreational boaters in a developing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) permit program. I appreciate you sharing your perspective with me on this issue and sincerely regret the delayed response.

As you may know, in 1972, Congress enacted significant amendments to the Clean Water Act in order to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation's waters. These changes to the Clean Water Act prohibited the discharge of any pollutant from a point source into navigable U.S. waters without a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In 1973, the EPA created regulations to implement the NPDES permitting requirements under the CWA and included a provision that exempted routine vessel discharges.

In 1999, Northwest Environmental Advocates (NWEA) petitioned the EPA to repeal the exemption of routine vessel discharges from NPDES permitting requirements contending that the exemption was inconsistent with the Clean Water Act. The primary goal of this petition was to force the EPA to regulate ballast water discharges. Ballast water is sea water that ships carry for stability and maneuverability during transit . There have been widespread concerns for years that improperly handled ballast water could spread invasive aquatic species. The NWEA petition to repeal the exemption was denied by the EPA prompting NWEA to file suit against the EPA. In September 2006, the U.S. District Court for Northern District of California found the EPA's regulation exempting routine vessel discharges from permitting requirements inconsistent with the Clean Water Act and directed the agency to develop an operational discharge permit for all vessels in the United States by September 30, 2008.

In an effort to extend the original EPA exemption for routine vessel discharges and make that exemption law, Representatives Gene Taylor (D-MS-4) and Candice Miller (R-MI-10) introduced the Recreational Boating Act of 2007 (H.R. 2550) on May 24, 2007. On September 18, 2007, Senator Mel Martinez (D-FL) introduced a companion bill, S. 2067, in the Senate. This legislation, if enacted, would exempt non-pollutant discharges such as bilge water, deck runoff, and engine cooling water from NPDES permitting requirements. The exemption would not affect laws that currently prevent garbage, sewage, oil or other pollutants from being discharged from a recreational vessel. H.R. 2550 is currently being considered by the House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment while its companion bill in the Senate, S. 2067, is being reviewed by the Senate Committee on Environmental and Public Works.

On September 27, 2008, Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) introduced and later withdrew an amendment to the Ballast Water Management Act (S. 1578) during a meeting of the Senate Commerce Committee. The amendment would have exempted recreational vessels from NPDES permits. The Nelson amendment was withdrawn due to disagreement over its language, but Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, vowed to work with Nelson and introduce an independent measure before an EPA permit program begins next year. Please be assured that I am committed to ensuring that recreational boaters can enjoy their activity without being subject to a permit program intended for ships carrying ballast water.

Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter.  Finally, you may be interested in signing up for my weekly update for Washington state residents. Every Monday, I provide a brief outline about my work in the Senate and issues of importance to Washington State .  If you are interested in subscribing to this update, please visit my website at http://cantwell.senate.gov .  Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance.


Sincerely,
Maria Cantwell
United States Senator

For future correspondence with my office, please visit my website at
http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/index.html
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Xsftballer
Forum Member
**
Offline


St. Croix Rods Pro Staff,
Anglers Marine Pro Staff

Posts: 254
Location: enumclaw
Joined: 04/17/05
Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #8 - 10/22/07 at 22:47:48
Quote Print Post  
" In September, 2006, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a 34-year-old exemption for recreational boats from an EPA regulation intended to stop ballast water discharge from ocean-going freighters and tankers in U.S. waters. "

Now you know that I am not the brightest bulb we have here, but I am reading this and I see "Ocean-going freighters and tankers".


I did not see the rest of the article and I am on dial-up so I could not play the video that was on there. I may not be getting the whole story.

  

Misunderstood
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jack
Forum Member
**
Offline



Posts: 113
Location: west seattle
Joined: 01/16/05
Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #9 - 10/23/07 at 02:05:24
Quote Print Post  
Don't sell yourself short mike, you are least a 50 watter!  Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Wabasmstr
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #10 - 10/23/07 at 02:10:44
Quote Print Post  
I received the same answer as the D.S...... alot of BS..........


Hopefully we'll be saved by someone other than the politicians and the 9th circuit...or maybe the fires down there will get the court somehow..   I should be ashame....very ashame...no I'm not....burn baby burn (9th circuit only if the fires can get there without hurting anymore innocent folks)...

CP
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Larry S.
Board Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 4201
Location: Kent Wa.
Joined: 08/21/02
Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #11 - 10/23/07 at 03:53:28
Quote Print Post  
Aint it funny how we can be fed tainted meet from "Hoof-N-Mouth" Cattle, let our kids play with lead coated Chinese Toys and send our Troops into harms way without much needed plate steel armour but we will chase folks around because we might not have a water filtration system/permit on a pleasure boat that might never even see a tanker or freighter in its life!!!!



Cry sad.......just sad.......
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Nick-Barr
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #12 - 10/24/07 at 02:39:38
Quote Print Post  
I got the same letter.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Xsftballer
Forum Member
**
Offline


St. Croix Rods Pro Staff,
Anglers Marine Pro Staff

Posts: 254
Location: enumclaw
Joined: 04/17/05
Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #13 - 10/24/07 at 11:35:21
Quote Print Post  
Jack that was some funny stuff right there!
  

Misunderstood
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gotfive
Ex Member


Re: This needs ALL our attention!
Reply #14 - 10/24/07 at 21:11:08
Quote Print Post  
It's funny, you just never know who knows who.  On a work project that I recently completed using 4 million in federal funds, I personally got to know the late Senator Dunn and Senator Cantwell.  While I have never presumed to be a democrat (I have always leaned a bit right, if you had not figured that our already Wink), I did enjoy my time working with her and appreciated her assistance with communicating our community needs with the monster buracracy that is the ACOE.  Anyway, I have had many conversations with Sen. Cantwell, including this topic, asking her to be dilligent on the big boys but to be cautious about far left language  Undecided in any future bills under the CWA umbrella that would apply to the little guy just out on the water to have a nice time.  The CWA is the guiding document by which I treat and discharge from our wastewater treatment plant.  I will say that, though the letter is a form letter, that she is sincere in her beliefs regarding ballast water.  That said, voice your concern, the more you of you that can the better.  It is NEVER a bad idea to simply send an email. 

And Mike - I'll give you a 100 watt if I can get those leadheads in a one ounce size next year from you and Henry!!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo